The renaming of Fort William in Kolkata as Vijay Durg has evoked mixed responses with some disagreeing with rechristening of the monument. Fort William, originally named after King William III of England, has been a symbol of British colonial rule for a long time. The idea of renaming it follows a larger trend of decolonisation, where places with colonial names are being given names that reflect India’s own history.

Historical significance of Fort William

Fort William, built in 1696, is an important part of Kolkata’s history. The British East India Company constructed it to strengthen its hold on Bengal, turning it into a key centre for British administration and military activities. After Independence, it became an important military base, and now serves as the headquarters of the Eastern Command of the Indian Army.

The fort has been a witness to military planning of major historical events, such as the Battle of Plassey in 1757, which helped the British gain control over Bengal. During the Revolt of 1857, also known as the First War of Independence, it was a crucial base of the British military, which held it through the Second World War and until India won Independence. Renaming it as Vijay Durg marks a symbolic shift from colonial memories to celebrating India’s heritage.

For William and India’s wars of 1962 and 1971

Fort William played an important role in both the 1962 India-China War and the 1971 India-Pakistan War, although its involvement was more about strategy than direct fighting.

1962 India-China War: During the 1962 war between India and China, Fort William in Kolkata was a key military base for the Indian Army. It served as the headquarters for the Eastern Command, which was responsible for overseeing military operations in the eastern region, particularly along the North East India border. The war, which saw India facing major military losses led to a review of India’s defence strategies including improving the role of command centres like Fort William.

1971 India-Pakistan War: In the 1971 war, which resulted in the creation of Bangladesh, Fort William’s role became even more significant as the headquarters for the Eastern Command. The Eastern Command led India’s military operations against Pakistan in the eastern region, especially in Bengal. Fort William was crucial in planning and carrying out the operations that ultimately led to victory in East Pakistan, creating Bangladesh. The fort’s strategic importance grew during this war as it coordinated the Indian Army’s efforts.

Meaning behind Vijay Durg

Vijay Durg, meaning “Fort of Victory,” holds deep historical and cultural importance. The name comes from the famous Vijaydurg Fort in Maharashtra, which is linked to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and his military strength. Renaming Fort William as Vijay Durg represents resilience, victory over oppression and self-reliance, fitting into India’s larger efforts to move away from colonial influences.

By changing the name, the government aims to honour India’s fight against colonial rule and strengthen a national identity based on its own heritage rather than foreign history.

The renaming of Fort William is not a one-time event but part of a larger effort to reclaim India’s historical and cultural identity. In recent years, many cities, roads and institutions have also been renamed.

For example, in 2015, Aurangzeb Road in Delhi was changed to Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Road. In 2018, Allahabad went back to its ancient name, Prayagraj. Similarly, Rajpath was renamed Kartavya Path to move away from colonial meanings and emphasise India’s values of duty and responsibility. The idea behind these changes has been to sever the long colonial connection and present it as a symbol of Indian pride.

A mixed response

Supporters of the renaming argue that keeping colonial-era names honours an oppressive past instead of celebrating India’s achievements. They see renaming as a way to restore national pride and emphasise India’s independence in cultural and historical narratives.

Renaming Fort William as Vijay Durg also fits with India’s tradition of honouring its freedom fighters and warriors. Since the fort now serves as an important military base, a new name would highlight Indian military history rather than its colonial past.

However, the renaming has faced criticism from historians, cultural experts and some members of the public. Opponents argue that changing names removes historical context instead of encouraging a deeper understanding of it. They suggest that instead of renaming, India should focus on educating people about colonial history and its effects.

Some historians also point out that Fort William is an important part of Kolkata’s identity and changing its name could cause confusion and break historical continuity. Others worry that frequent renaming takes attention away from urgent governance and development issues.

Renaming as a tool of decolonisation

India is not the only country renaming colonial-era landmarks. Many former colonies have done the same to reshape their identities after independence. In South Africa, towns and streets once named after colonial figures have been changed to honour local leaders and indigenous heritage. Zimbabwe, after gaining independence from Britain, renamed its capital from Salisbury to Harare. Even in the United States, statues of Confederate leaders have been removed and institutions linked to colonial oppression have been renamed as part of a broader effort to reconsider historical narratives.

India’s decision to rename Fort William as Vijay Durg follows a common pattern of former colonies reclaiming their historical and cultural identities.

The politics about it

Beyond history and culture, renaming Fort William also has a political message. The incumbent government at the Centre has promoted nationalism and indigenous identity in its policies, and changing colonial-era names fits with this vision. This move is likely to appeal to nationalist sentiments showing the government’s dedication to decolonisation and cultural revival.

Renaming Fort William to Vijay Durg is a powerful symbol of India’s efforts to move away from its colonial past and reclaim its cultural heritage. While it helps assert India’s historical identity, the debate shows the challenge of balancing historical preservation with national pride. Whether or not the renaming happens, it has started an important discussion about how India remembers its past and shapes its future.

Link to article – 

Fort William renamed Vijay Durg: A monument that witnessed the rise and fall of British Empire